AD Model | Construction and Verification Solutions of Alzheimer's Disease Models
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a primary neurodegenerative disease of the brain with unknown etiology and complex pathogenesis, and it is one of the most common types of dementia. Clinically, it is mainly characterized by progressive memory loss, cognitive impairment, behavioral abnormalities, and personality disorders. Its typical pathological changes include neuronal loss, senile plaques (SP) formed by amyloid β-protein (Aβ) deposition, and neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) formed by hyperphosphorylation of tau protein [1]. With the accelerating process of population aging, AD has become a hot and focal issue of concern at home and abroad.
AD Modeling Methods
At present, the preparation ideas of commonly used AD animal models are mainly guided by reflecting the pathological, physiological, and clinical manifestations of AD. Establishing models simulating AD pathological characteristics is an important means for AD research. The establishment methods of AD animal models mainly include aging models, transgenic models, exogenous harmful substance injection models, etc. (Table 1). For example, researchers have established AD models characterized by senile plaques induced by direct intracerebral injection of Aβ. Currently, the main injected Aβ are Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, and Aβ25-35. The injection sites are mainly the unilateral/bilateral hippocampal CA1 area or lateral ventricle, and the injection time can range from 3 days to several weeks [3-4]. Among them, Aβ1-42 is the main form in AD neuropathological research. The nucleus (seed) formed by it initiates the formation of fibers, leading to the classic amyloidosis process.
|
Induction Principle |
Model |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
|
Aging |
Natural aging type |
Neuronal atrophy, cholinergic hypofunction, and cognitive impairment in the model's brain |
Elderly animals are difficult to obtain in large quantities, few neurofibrillary tangles and amyloid protein deposition, and long modeling time |
|
Senescence-accelerated mouse (SAM) |
Aβ deposition, abnormal tricarboxylic acid cycle of glucose metabolism, and immune dysfunction |
High cost and short lifespan |
|
|
D-galactose (D-gal) model |
Low price, neuronal loss, reduced protein synthesis, and learning and memory impairment |
Cannot produce AD-specific senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, with many uncertain factors |
|
|
Transgenic |
APP transgenic type |
Extracellular Aβ deposition, neuritic plaques, and neuronal synaptic loss |
No tau protein phosphorylation and NFT, no AD-specific hippocampal and cortical neuronal loss |
|
APP/PS-1 transgenic type |
Aβ deposition in the cortex and hippocampus, neuronal changes, and neurobehavioral dysfunction |
Unstable expression of exogenous genes, time-consuming modeling, poor fertility, and high cost |
|
|
Tau transgenic animal type |
Formation of NFT in the brainstem and spinal cord, and memory impairment |
Lack of Aβ deposition |
|
|
Exogenous harmful substance injection induction |
Aβ injection-induced type |
Aβ deposition, immune-inflammatory response, astrocyte proliferation, tau protein hyperphosphorylation, and significant decrease in ChAT activity |
Does not conform to the chronic onset characteristics of AD, Aβ aggregates locally at the injection site, and modeling causes non-targeted damage to brain tissue |
|
Aluminum poisoning-induced type |
Aβ aggregation, neuronal degeneration, spatial learning disorders, and memory impairment |
Long modeling cycle, no reduction in central cholinergic activity, and NFT different from AD patients |
|
|
Streptozotocin (STZ) type |
High tau protein phosphorylation, Aβ deposition, cholinergic loss, and oxidative stress |
High animal mortality, no neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques |
|
|
Scopolamine-induced type |
Simple and easy method, low cost, cholinergic nervous system disorders, and cognitive impairment |
Lack of typical AD pathological characteristics |
Next, we will share the method of inducing AD models with Aβ1-42 [3].
1. Take out the synthetic Aβ1-42 lyophilized powder stored at -80°C and equilibrate at room temperature for 30 minutes;
2. In a fume hood, suspend Aβ1-42 in 100% HFIP (1.596g/mL) at a concentration of 1mM, mix thoroughly, and aliquot into equal small portions;
3. Evaporate HFIP from the aliquoted small portions using a vacuum centrifugal evaporator, and store at -20°C after evaporation;
4. Before use, resuspend the above small portions of Aβ1-42 stored at -20°C in DMSO at a concentration of 5mM;
5. When in use, dilute to the experimental concentration with normal saline or artificial cerebrospinal fluid as needed for the experiment.
2. Unilateral Lateral Ventricle Cannulation in Mice
1. After anesthetizing mice with isoflurane inhalation, fix them on a mouse stereotaxic instrument;
2. Disinfect the top of the cranial bone with 75% alcohol, shave the hair, and disinfect again;
3. Cut the scalp to expose the skull, and remove the connective tissue on the surface of the skull with hydrogen peroxide. Disinfect again after the skull is dry;
4. Use a stereotaxic instrument to point the positioning needle to Bregma as the starting point, move the positioning needle to determine the cannula position (0.46mm anterior to Bregma, 1mm bilateral to the midline of the skull, 2.3mm deep), drill a hole with a skull drill, and randomly place the cannula (cannula diameter 0.48mm, inner core diameter 0.3mm) in the left and right lateral ventricles;
5. Adhere the gap between the cannula and the skull with bone glue, and fix the cannula on the skull with dental cement after the bone glue is dry;
6. Transfer the mice to an electric blanket, and put them back into the feeding box after waking up, with single cage and single feeding;
7. During drug injection, pull out the inner core of the catheter, connect the mouse brain cannula and the microinjection needle with a PE tube of appropriate length, and the injection speed of the microinjection pump is 0.5μL/min.
Before the start of the task, inject normal saline or Aβ1-42 into each group of mice that have completed cannula implantation, with the injection speed of the microinjection pump being 0.5μL/min and the injection volume being 2μL. After injection, stop the needle for 5 minutes to prevent backflow of the injection solution, then put back the inner core and lock the nut. Spontaneous alternation Y-maze test and novel location recognition task: 10 minutes after the mice are injected with drugs, start the detection of the spontaneous alternation Y-maze test and the novel location recognition task.
An ideal model should have at least the following three characteristics:
1. Have the main neuropathological characteristics of AD: SP and NFT.
2. Exhibit important pathological changes of AD: neuronal death, neural synaptic loss, astrocyte proliferation, etc.
3. Show cognitive impairment.
In basic AD research and drug discovery, mouse models are important resources for revealing biological mechanisms, verifying molecular targets, and screening potential compounds. Both transgenic and non-transgenic mouse models can obtain different types of AD-like pathology in vivo. Although there are a large number of genetic and biochemical studies on AD pathogenic pathways, as a disease mainly characterized by cognitive impairment, the final readout of any intervention should be the detection of learning and memory [4].
Commonly used test experiments for behavioral analysis of AD mouse models include: contextual fear conditioning, radial arm water maze, and Morris water maze (Figures 2 & 3 & 4). Below, we will take reference [4] as an example to detail the equipment and operation steps of the contextual fear conditioning experiment.



Mice are tested individually in a conditioning chamber (Figure 2), which is located in a sound-attenuating box with a transparent plexiglass window for video recording of the experiment. The conditioning chamber has a 36-bar shock grid floor, which is removable. After each subject, it is cleaned with 75% ethanol and then with water. To provide background white noise (72dB), a single computer fan is installed on one side of the sound-attenuating box.
Before the behavioral experiment, handle the mice once a day for 3 consecutive days. Only one animal is placed in the test room at a time. Place it in the conditioning chamber for 2 minutes, then emit a discrete tone (CS) at 2800Hz and 85dB for 30 seconds. During the last 2 seconds of the tone, the mouse receives a foot shock (US, 0.50-0.80mA, duration 2 seconds) through the floor strips, and the intensity of the foot shock can be adjusted to induce stronger memory. After the CS/US pairing, the mouse is placed in the conditioning chamber for another 30 seconds and then returned to the cage. Freezing behavior can be scored using dedicated software. Based on experience, it is useful to double-check the freezing time through manual scoring. Twenty-four hours after training, the mice are returned to the conditioning chamber. The freezing time is 5 consecutive minutes. Thirty-six hours after training, the mice are transferred to a new conditioning box. A new environment is created by inserting a triangular cage with a smooth floor and a vanilla scent. After 2 minutes (pre-CS test), the mice are exposed to a tone with the same characteristics as that used in training for 3 minutes (CS test), and the freezing time is measured. Usually, 15-20 animals are used in each condition.
An important control to be performed during the test of fear memory is the sensory threshold assessment. Changes in sensory perception of electric shock may be due to experimental manipulation leading to misattribution of the observed phenotypic memory. Deliver a series of single foot shocks to animals placed on the same grid used for fear conditioning. Initially, a 0.1mA shock is applied for 1 second to assess the animal's withdrawal, jumping, and vocalization behaviors. Every 30 seconds, the shock intensity is increased by 0.1-0.7mA, then returned to 0mA in 0.1mA increments every 30 seconds. The vocalization, withdrawal, and jumping thresholds of each animal are quantified by averaging the shock intensities at which each animal exhibits behavioral responses to the foot shock.
It is reported that there are about 24 million Alzheimer's disease cases worldwide. By 2050, the total number of dementia patients is estimated to increase fourfold. Although AD is a public health problem, so far, only two classes of drugs have been approved for the treatment of AD, including cholinesterase inhibitors (naturally derived, synthetic, and hybrid analogs) and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists [5].
Several physiological processes in AD damage acetylcholine-producing cells and reduce cholinergic transmission through the brain. Cholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) are divided into reversible, irreversible, and pseudo-reversible types. They work by blocking cholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) from decomposing ACh, leading to an increase in ACh levels in the synaptic cleft. On the other hand, excessive activation of NMDAR leads to an increase in the level of intracellular calcium influx, thereby promoting cell death and synaptic dysfunction. NMDAR antagonists prevent excessive activation of NMDAR glutamate receptors, thereby blocking calcium influx and restoring their normal activity. Although these two classes of drugs are effective, they only treat the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease but cannot cure or prevent the disease.

Establishing an ideal animal model to simulate human disease status is conducive to in-depth research on the etiology, pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment of AD. At present, due to the inability to establish a perfect AD animal model, when conducting drug screening, using two or more AD animal models simultaneously is more convincing than using a single model, and can further confirm the effectiveness of the drug.
[1] Puzzo D, Gulisano W, Palmeri A, et al. Rodent models for Alzheimer's disease drug discovery[J]. Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2015, 10(7):703-711.
[2] Breijyeh Z, Karaman R. Comprehensive Review on Alzheimer's Disease: Causes and Treatment [J]. Molecules, 2020, 25, (24).
[3] Lü J Y. The mechanism of Aβ1-42 or Aβ1-15 improving memory in APP/PS1/Tau transgenic Alzheimer's disease mice[D]. East China Normal University, 2023.
[4] A D P, B L L, A A P, et al. Behavioral assays with mouse models of Alzheimer's disease: Practical considerations and guidelines-ScienceDirect[J]. Biochemical Pharmacology, 2014, 88(4):450-467.
[5] Breijyeh Z, Karaman R. Comprehensive Review on Alzheimer's Disease: Causes and Treatment[J]. Molecules, 2020, 25:5789.
Recommended Products for AD Modeling
|
Product Code |
Product Name |
Specification |
|
abs45128173 |
Amyloid β-Protein(1-42) |
1mg |
|
abs44056601 |
Amyloid β-Protein(1-40) |
1mg |
|
abs45151799 |
Amyloid β-Protein(25-35) |
1mg |
|
abs816779 |
D-Galactose (D-galactose) |
500mg |
|
abs812888 |
Streptozocin |
100mg |
|
abs47000420 |
Scopolamine |
50mg |
|
abs9839 |
Artificial Cerebrospinal Fluid (ACSF, sterile) |
500mL |
Recommended Small-Molecule Compounds for AD Treatment
|
Product Code |
Product Name |
Specification |
Function |
|
abs817977 |
Donepezil HCl |
5mg |
Cholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor |
|
abs816566 |
Rivastigmine |
50mg |
Cholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor |
|
abs822010 |
Galanthamine |
100mg |
Cholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor |
|
abs816243 |
Memantine hydrochloride |
500mg |
N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist |
ANT BIO PTE. LTD. is dedicated to advancing life science research by providing high-quality, reliable reagents and comprehensive solutions. We recognize the critical challenges in Alzheimer's disease (AD) model construction and verification, and the urgent need for standardized, specialized experimental tools. Through our specialized sub-brands (Absin, Starter, UA), we have developed a targeted product portfolio for AD research, covering core AD modeling reagents (Aβ proteins, D-galactose, streptozocin, etc.), AD treatment small-molecule compounds, and auxiliary experimental reagents (artificial cerebrospinal fluid).
Our team adheres to stringent quality control standards throughout the product development and production process, ensuring the high purity, stability, and biological activity of each product. We are committed to providing professional technical support and customer-centric services, helping researchers overcome experimental challenges such as complex AD modeling operations, unstable model reproducibility, and difficult verification of pathological characteristics, and accelerating the pace of scientific research breakthroughs in AD-related fields. ANT BIO PTE. LTD. strives to be a trusted partner for scientists worldwide, contributing to the advancement of AD pathogenesis research and the development of innovative therapeutic technologies.
This article is AI-compiled and interpreted based on the original work related to Alzheimer's disease (AD) model construction and verification research. All intellectual property (e.g., experimental protocols, data, images) of the original publication shall belong to the relevant research team. For any infringement, please contact us promptly and we will take immediate action.
ANT BIO PTE. LTD. – Empowering Scientific Breakthroughs
At ANTBIO, we are committed to advancing life science research through high-quality, reliable reagents and comprehensive solutions. Our specialized sub-brands (Absin, Starter, UA) cover a full spectrum of AD research needs, from AD modeling core reagents and treatment small-molecule compounds to auxiliary experimental reagents. With a focus on innovation, quality, and customer-centricity, we strive to be your trusted partner in overcoming AD model construction and verification challenges and driving progress in AD therapeutic technology. Explore our product portfolio today and elevate your research to new heights.
